350z vs Mustang GT
Posted by admin | Under Mustang GT Thursday Sep 25, 2008
2005 350z vs 2002 Mustang GT, jammin Marilyn Manson’s Resident Evil Theme Music…for more info on my Stang check out:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/842097
Duration : 0:2:9
2005 350z vs 2002 Mustang GT, jammin Marilyn Manson’s Resident Evil Theme Music…for more info on my Stang check out:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/842097
Duration : 0:2:9
Nice music. I …
Nice music. I didn’t know that the Z was so shitty.
even the cobra …
even the cobra can’t beat the m5 mustang is sucks
99-04 GT’s are …
99-04 GT’s are 260HP, 302TQ
i get tired of …
i get tired of steam engine cars want to run against my locomotive gt. i only look at V8 not v6. waste of gas and time
the GT is actually …
the GT is actually 300HP but your right it all depends on the driver… doesn’t look like the Z was really kicking…
i burn mustang gt’s …
i burn mustang gt’s with my g35 all day
ahahh i just …
ahahh i just roasted a nismo 350z by 2 cars stock 99 gt
if you people think …
if you people think that GT is stock ure high. no 99-04 (or even 05-08) GT is faster than a correctly driven 350z. Especially the new HR engined Zs. 260hp IS NOT faster than 306hp with the same weight. Thats just science people. my stock 07 z is a testiment to this more times than I can count.
Still a high 14 sec …
Still a high 14 sec car Chris. Booyah!!
that came as a …
that came as a suprise not lmao
“im not sure what …
“im not sure what you are arguing about”
that clears it up…ur sayin ur HP #’s are equivalent to a 321CI motor, assuming all motors put out the same HP…which they arent.
im not sure what …
im not sure what you are arguing about, all im saying is the 231 cubic inch 3.8 litre moter, with an m-90 on top of it, is equivalent to a naturally aspirated 321 cubic inch motor. The supercharger is replacement for displacement!
all that aside, V8′ …
all that aside, V8’s respond to boltons and engine work much more genorously than that of a V6 or 4 banger…which leaves more room for more power to the wheels.
“no replacement for …
“no replacement for displacement”
this statement is too true to begin to describe, take that 321CI motor ur talkin about then throw a supercharger on it…the power that motor would make would be rediculous compared to ur GTP motor with a m-90.
and a supercharger equivalent to 90 more CI is too vauge a statement 2 begin with. do u mean 90 more cubic inches in a GM motor? theres motors out there, 4.2L, with over 400hp naturally aspirated…all depends on how that specific motor is designed.
race an 07+ Z. You …
race an 07+ Z. You will get spanked.
250z cant drive an …
250z cant drive an looks like it missed a gear. older gt’s are slow as piss
its the equivalent …
its the equivalent of 90 more ci thats why they call it a m-90, no replacement for displacement, bullshit!
i dont know where …
i dont know where this conversation is going but a supercharger doesnt add any C.I., and for crak did u just say u beat cobras in a Z34?!
thats why i bought …
thats why i bought it, v8 power and v6 mpg, the supercharger adds 90 cubic inches, so it like having 321 cubic inches
Not really. your …
Not really. your supercharged… forced induction. so you have the power at the gas mine has to build from launch. and I used to have a chevy Z34 that was a v6 and ran cobras not really a big difference
thats a v8 and im …
thats a v8 and im only runnin a v6 big difference there too!, and ive raced a 600 or 650 gsxr
See no forced …
See no forced induction and I race Bikes… Its all good though
thats correct:)
thats correct:)
heads? im running …
heads? im running that minus the cam. and im putting about 230 to the wheels. but my other stangs is like 450 rwhp.
98 mustang GT
98 mustang GT